Skip to content
Case File
d-20892House OversightOther

Alan Dershowitz seeks limited intervention in Jane Doe civil case alleging false claims tied to Epstein and a 2007 non‑prosecution agreement

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #010735
Pages
1
Persons
2

Summary

The passage reveals that Dershowitz is attempting to intervene in a civil suit to refute allegations that were not previously disclosed to authorities, suggesting possible procedural manipulation or s Dershowitz filed a motion for limited intervention to contest allegations made by Jane Doe #3 and #4 The allegations against Dershowitz were absent from earlier statements to the FBI, civil filings,

This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.

View Source Collection

Persons Referenced (2)

Tags

jeffrey-epsteinprocedural-manipulationnonprosecution-agreementcivil-litigationlegal-filingforeign-influence-via-epsteinspotential-evidence-suppressionalan-dershowitzlegal-exposurehouse-oversightprocedural-misconduct
Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Jane Doe #3’s affidavit falsely claims former President Bill Clinton was on Jeffrey Epstein’s island, citing it to implicate Professor Alan Dershowitz

The passage links a former U.S. President and a high‑profile attorney to the Epstein island narrative, suggesting possible misconduct and providing a specific false claim that could be investigated fo Jane Doe #3 alleges Bill Clinton was present on Epstein’s private island during her own presence. The claim is presented in an affidavit filed in case 9:08‑cv‑80736‑KAM. The allegation is used to bol

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Court filing argues that Judge Marra's order does not bar unredacted documents on alleged sexual abuse by Alan Dershowitz in Epstein-related CVRA case

The passage identifies a legal dispute over the confidentiality of documents that could contain allegations linking a high‑profile attorney (Alan Dershowitz) to sexual abuse of a known victim (Virgini Judge Marra allowed Giuffre to testify but initially struck certain allegations as confidential. The order permits re‑filing of documents with omitted portions, suggesting unredacted material may b D

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Doe filing alleges Prince Andrew lobbying and confidentiality deals tied to Epstein case

The passage links Prince Andrew and high‑profile attorney Alan Dershowitz to alleged lobbying and confidential plea negotiations in the Epstein matter, suggesting possible foreign‑commerce implication Jane Doe #3 alleges Prince Andrew lobbied the U.S. government for a favorable plea arrangement for J Claims that confidentiality and "blank check" provisions were negotiated in connection with Prince

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Email urging silence on Jeffrey Epstein allegations and suggesting contact with Alan Dershowitz

The passage references Jeffrey Epstein and Alan Dershowitz in a vague advisory context, but provides no concrete details about transactions, dates, or specific wrongdoing. It hints at potential legal Sender advises the recipient to ignore Jeffrey Epstein’s lawyer and instead seek Alan Dershowitz’s c Mentions possible investigations and reputational risk if allegations are not publicly denied. All

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Court filing lists motions to admit allegations linking Bill Clinton, Jeffrey Epstein, Alan Dershowitz, foreign presidents and Prince Andrew

The document references several high‑profile figures (Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew, Jeffrey Epstein, Alan Dershowitz, foreign presidents) in the context of admissibility motions, suggesting possible cl Motion to admit claim that the plaintiff met Bill Clinton on Epstein’s private island twice. Reference to stories involving Alan Dershowitz and foreign presidents as “highly relevant”. Inclusion of P

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Discovery Dispute Over Alan Dershowitz's Document Control in Defamation Suit

The passage outlines a procedural battle over production of documents and metadata in a defamation case involving Alan Dershowitz. While it flags potential evidence that could expose communications or Plaintiffs allege Dershowitz is withholding documents and metadata under the claim of ‘control’. The objection is framed as ‘word play’ and gamesmanship, suggesting possible intentional concealment D

1p

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.