Skip to content
Case File
d-19352House OversightOther

Certificate of Service for Defendant’s Response in House Oversight Case

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #011471
Pages
1
Persons
2

Summary

The document is a routine certificate of service listing attorneys and addresses, offering no substantive information about actors, transactions, or misconduct. It provides no investigative leads. Date of service: March 17, 2017 Parties served: Sigrid S. McCawley, Paul G. Cassell, Meredith Schultz, J. Stanley Pottinger, Bradley Law firms involved: Boies, Schiller & Flexner; Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing

This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.

View Source Collection

Persons Referenced (2)

Tags

legal-documentcourt-filinghouse-oversightservice-of-process
Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team files a motion requesting the court to authorize subpoenas to Annie...

Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team files a motion requesting the court to authorize subpoenas to Annie Farmer, Maria Farmer, Brad Edwards, and Stanley Pottinger for specific evidence related to the allegations. The motion is made ex parte and in camera, citing policy reasons and the need to protect investigative and trial strategy.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

This document is a subpoena issued to Stanley Pottinger and Edwards Pottinger LLC, requesting the pr...

This document is a subpoena issued to Stanley Pottinger and Edwards Pottinger LLC, requesting the production of documents related to Annie Farmer, Maria Farmer, and the Epstein Victim's Compensation Program. The subpoena is part of the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The requested documents include communications, contingent fee agreements, and materials related to the Epstein Victim's Compensation Program.

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Bradley J. Edwards Seeks Summary Judgment Claiming Absolute Immunity in Jeffrey Epstein Lawsuit

The passage reveals a legal strategy to shield an attorney from liability in a case brought by Jeffrey Epstein, suggesting possible undisclosed misconduct or defamatory statements tied to a high‑profi Attorney Bradley J. Edwards invokes absolute immunity to block claims by Jeffrey Epstein. Cites precedent cases establishing broad litigation privilege for statements made during judicial pr The fili

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Jane Doe #3’s affidavit falsely claims former President Bill Clinton was on Jeffrey Epstein’s island, citing it to implicate Professor Alan Dershowitz

The passage links a former U.S. President and a high‑profile attorney to the Epstein island narrative, suggesting possible misconduct and providing a specific false claim that could be investigated fo Jane Doe #3 alleges Bill Clinton was present on Epstein’s private island during her own presence. The claim is presented in an affidavit filed in case 9:08‑cv‑80736‑KAM. The allegation is used to bol

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Court filing header for House Oversight case shows attorney representation but contains no substantive allegations

The document is merely a procedural filing listing counsel and witness information. It provides no details on actors, transactions, or misconduct, offering no actionable investigative lead. Filed by attorney Jack A. Goldberger of Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss Witness listed: Keith J. Brett, Director of Multimedia Division, Legal‑EZE No exhibits marked; appears to be a direct examination transcript

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Court filing argues that Judge Marra's order does not bar unredacted documents on alleged sexual abuse by Alan Dershowitz in Epstein-related CVRA case

The passage identifies a legal dispute over the confidentiality of documents that could contain allegations linking a high‑profile attorney (Alan Dershowitz) to sexual abuse of a known victim (Virgini Judge Marra allowed Giuffre to testify but initially struck certain allegations as confidential. The order permits re‑filing of documents with omitted portions, suggesting unredacted material may b D

1p

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.