Court docket entry for State v. Jeffrey Epstein, Palm Beach County, Feb 20, 2008
Summary
The passage is a routine court filing showing basic case information and attorney appearances. It provides no substantive allegations, financial details, or connections to high‑level actors beyond the Case number and date of hearing Names of state and defense counsel Location of the hearing in Palm Beach County
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (3)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
Internal memo reveals aggressive defense strategy for Jeffrey Epstein involving high‑profile attorneys and attempts to disqualify prosecutors
The passage details a coordinated defense effort for Epstein that included Alan Dershowitz, Kenneth Starr, and other senior legal figures, and describes attempts to disqualify prosecutors. It suggests Defense team hired Alan Dershowitz, former Dean Kenneth Starr, and other senior lawyers for Epstein. Defense counsel attempted to disqualify at least two prosecutors by investigating their personal l
Allegations of Prosecutorial Misconduct in the Jeffrey Epstein Case Involving Federal Prosecutors and FAUSA Jeffrey Sloman
The passage alleges irregular conduct by the Miami U.S. Attorney’s Office, including inappropriate involvement of a First Assistant U.S. Attorney (Jeffrey Sloman) in both the Epstein case and a separa FAUSA Jeffrey Sloman allegedly participated in the initial phone call with Epstein's defense counsel AUSA Marie Villafana issued document requests for Epstein's 2004‑2005 tax returns and medical reco
Letter from U.S. Attorney Kevin Acosta to Kenneth Starr cites concerns over Epstein plea‑deal negotiations and potential collusion by defense counsel
The passage reveals an internal DOJ communication highlighting that prosecutors were aware of possible tactics to undermine the 2007 non‑prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein. It names specific o Acosta’s December 2007 letter to Kenneth Starr flags Epstein’s failure to schedule a plea hearing, v Prosecutors expressed concern that defense counsel was deliberately filing collateral challenges t
Prosecutors allegedly colluded with Jeffrey Epstein’s defense to shape a non‑prosecution agreement
The passage provides specific names (U.S. Attorney Geoffrey B. Acosta, lead prosecutor Marie Villafafia, DOJ official Sloman, defense attorney Jay Lefkowitz) and concrete details of private meetings a Emails show prosecutors used private accounts to discuss deal terms with Epstein’s lawyers. Acosta met privately with defense counsel at a Marriott hotel to keep the non‑prosecution agreement Victim
Deposition excerpt hints at possible misrepresentation by Dershowitz/Epstein defense regarding flight logs and alleged arrest
The transcript contains vague references to Professor Alan Dershowitz, Jeffrey Epstein’s defense team, and a disputed arrest of a ‘Miss Roberts’. It raises questions about whether defense counsel prep Witness questioned about an alleged arrest of Miss Roberts that may not be reflected in interrogator Reference to Professor Dershowitz possibly testifying falsely or omitting information. Inquiry whe
Alleged undisclosed non‑prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein and possible prosecutorial misconduct
The passage suggests that a U.S. Attorney’s Office entered into a non‑prosecution agreement (NPA) with Jeffrey Epstein that was not disclosed to victims, and that prosecutors may have coordinated with Assistant U.S. Attorney Dexter Lee alleges the USAO concealed a non‑prosecution agreement with Epste Former federal prosecutor Hakes claims prosecutors consulted defense counsel on victim‑notificatio
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.