Tom Griffiths discusses human-centered AI value alignment and bounded optimality
Summary
The passage is a generic discussion of AI research concepts with no mention of influential actors, financial flows, misconduct, or actionable leads. It offers no investigative value. Tom Griffiths advocates a human‑centered approach to AI value alignment. He links AI learning to human learning and bounded optimality. References to Daniel Kahneman’s work on rationality are included.
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (1)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
Alleged Subpoenas and Unprovided Documents from Alan Dershowitz and a 2011 Call by Virginia Roberts (Stormy Daniels) from Australia
The passage hints at multiple undisclosed subpoena attempts (2009, 2011, 2013) directed at Alan Dershowitz and mentions a 2011 telephone call placed by Virginia Roberts (Stormy Daniels) from Australia Reference to a 2009 and 2011 attempt to obtain information from Alan Dershowitz. Mention of a 2013 records request to Dershowitz that allegedly yielded no documents. Claim that a 2011 telephone call
Comedy routine controversy involving Daniel Tosh and alleged rape joke
The passage only discusses a comedian's routine and audience reaction, with no concrete allegations, financial flows, or involvement of high‑level officials. It offers no actionable investigative lead Daniel Tosh made a controversial comment about rape during a show. Audience member protested and a woman claimed she was 'raped by five guys' in the joke. Tosh later issued an apology on Twitter.
Academic discussion on rationality vs heuristics in human cognition
The passage is a theoretical exposition on cognitive modeling with no mention of specific individuals, transactions, or controversial actions. It offers no actionable leads for investigation. Contrasts rational models with heuristic-based decision making. References Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky's work on cognitive biases. Discusses challenges of generalizability and accuracy in modeling human
Historical account of National Lawyers Guild's shift to radical left and anti‑Israel stance
The passage provides a narrative about the National Lawyers Guild's ideological evolution and mentions public figures, but offers no concrete, actionable leads, new allegations, financial transactions Describes the National Lawyers Guild's origins and early support for civil‑rights and Israel. Claims the guild was taken over by New Left activists in the early 1970s. Cites Reverend Daniel Berrigan'
Philosophical essay on morality, age limits, and brain function
The document contains no concrete allegations, names, transactions, or actionable intelligence linking powerful actors to misconduct. It is a speculative discussion of ethics and neuroscience without Discusses brain mechanisms of lying and denial Questions age-based legal thresholds in the U.S. References historian Daniel Goldhagen and the Holocaust metaphorically
Philosophical essay on evolution, intelligence, and AI with no actionable claims
The text contains only general philosophical commentary about evolution and AI, with no mention of specific individuals, institutions, financial transactions, or misconduct. It offers no investigative Discusses evolution of human intelligence versus other life forms References Daniel Dennett and Descartes Speculates on AI's future impact without concrete claims
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.