Jane Doe plaintiffs allege secret non‑prosecution agreement between U.S. Government and Jeffrey Epstein
Summary
The passage hints at a concealed government‑Epstein agreement (an NPA) that could be a significant investigative lead, but provides no concrete details—no dates, officials, or transaction data—making Four Jane Doe plaintiffs claim the government executed a secret non‑prosecution agreement (NPA) with The alleged NPA was allegedly concealed from victims and is the basis of the lawsuit. The plaintif
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (4)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
Jane Doe litigation references alleged secret government agreement with Epstein
The passage mentions a purported secret agreement between the government and Jeffrey Epstein, but provides no concrete details, dates, or names of officials. It is largely procedural language about jo Jane Doe plaintiffs allege a secret government agreement (NPA) with Jeffrey Epstein. The claim is used to support a Rule 15 motion to add additional Jane Does to the case. No specific officials, date
Court filings reveal alleged non‑prosecution agreement with Jeffrey Epstein and references to high‑profile political figures
The document contains sworn declarations and court orders that reference a secret non‑prosecution agreement (NPA) with Jeffrey Epstein, claims that the U.S. Government concealed it from victims, and m Petitioners allege the Government violated victims' rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act by hi Court order strikes detailed allegations but acknowledges they exist in the filings. Jane Doe 3’s
Court Finds U.S. Government Violated Victims' Rights by Granting Immunity to Potential Epstein Co‑Conspirators
The passage reveals that a federal court ruled the Justice Department knowingly concealed a non‑prosecution agreement (NPA) that granted blanket immunity to unnamed co‑conspirators of Jeffrey Epstein, Court granted summary judgment to victims under the Crime Victims’ Rights Act (CVRA) on Feb. 21, 201 The government entered a confidential NPA with Epstein that barred disclosure to victims. NPA alle
Government claims two Jeffrey Epstein victims were complicit, challenging their victim status in 2008 lawsuit
The passage reveals a new government position that two alleged victims were allegedly paid to recruit others for Epstein, which could affect the non‑prosecution agreement and victim‑rights claims. It Assistant U.S. Attorney Dexter Lee asserted two plaintiffs were complicit and therefore not victims The claim could undermine the 2007 non‑prosecution agreement that shielded Epstein from federal ch
Victims' CVRA filing alleges government withheld discovery on Dershowitz, Prince Andrew and Jeffrey Epstein in 2011
The passage reveals that victims in a Crime Victims' Rights Act case sought discovery about high‑profile figures (Dershowitz, Prince Andrew, Jeffrey Epstein) and that the government allegedly resisted Victims filed a CVRA petition (Jane Doe No.1 & No.2) in 2008 against the United States (9:08‑cv‑8073 Discovery requests were made on Oct. 11, 2011 seeking info on Alan Dershowitz, Prince Andrew, and
Maldives President Mohamed Waheed Hassan Seeks Advice from Jeffrey Epstein on $4 B Anonymous Funding Deal
The email reveals a potential $4 billion anonymous fund willing to be deposited in the Maldives central bank, with a proposed special‑purpose vehicle created by presidential decree. It directly links Anonymous funds manager proposes $4 billion deposit in Maldives central bank. Funds to be lent back to the government via promissory notes and a government‑owned construction SPV Deal requires a pres
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.